Marking Classmate's Work

In groups, we watched other classmate's work and marked them depending on their use of skills and technical ability.

Group 1- Alexandra, Demi, Stephanie and Sareena

We gave this group a high Level 3, Mark 42 as we felt they showed good skills with their work.  They used a variety of shots, their plot was simple but followed the point of the task given and the camera work was good with some steady shots. The sound was suitable and the dialogue was simple and understandable. To improve, we believed that they could have faded the non-diagetic into the diagetic better and clearer. Overall it was a well-filmed piece and was suitable for the task in hand.

Group 2- Heather, Laura, Brogan and Sam

We gave this group a level 3, Mark 38, we felt that the plot was relavant and they used a decent range of shots but the editing wasn't particularly fluid.Their was some steady shots and the variety of shots were good, but the editing wasn't great and the cuts do not run smoothly in some places. Also the non-diagetic music dissapears before the end of the film which also shows the film to have less fluidity. To improve, we believe that this group could have improved the smoothness of the editing.

Group 3- Jessica, Luke, Hannah and Serena

We gave this group a Level 2, Mark 32, we felt that this group showed a basic set of skills but did not show any particular advanced skills at any point in the piece. The dialogue was too quiet and was hard to interpret, also the editing wasn't very good and showed no clarity. To improve their grade, this group could have made the no-diagetic sound more effective and increased the volume of their dialogue.